Is the reasonable foreseeability test currently used in negligence cases?

some books i have read say it is currently used, and some say it isn't.


This is especially referring to AustraliaIs the reasonable foreseeability test currently used in negligence cases?
Reasonable foreseeability alone is not enough to establish a duty of care; that is a given. However, reasonable foreseeability is still the key starting point in finding whether a duty is owed.Is the reasonable foreseeability test currently used in negligence cases?
good question.

makeup base