Is there ';inter-homogeneity'; of Collins test cases ?

%26lt;%26lt;When you examine known writing, especially in a case like this, it is very crucial, that you determine the validity of the known writing. In the 1980s we had the problem of Hitler's Diary, which was accepted as genuine by one of the leading document examiners in the world. Michel and Baier, two of the German document examiners who were involved in exposing the Hitler forgery in an article in the Journal of Forensic Science Society, pointed out some principles that should be used in examining documents. ';The reliable information on the point of origin of the material examined has to be obtained and inter-homogeneity of the documents cannot be over stressed';. Basically, you have to compare all of the known writings together to make sure how it breaks down into different groups. Can they be accounted for, or can they not be accounted for? The known writing of Casement should be crucial. In effect, as much time should be spent on examining the known writing as should be spent on the questioned writing. %26gt;%26gt;





Does any of the material look like forgeries ?Is there ';inter-homogeneity'; of Collins test cases ?
Their are forgeries in all sorts of places and the collins project was only one example, cover ups are done so that the majority of people are left wondering what went wrong, but those who know what went wrong won't be saying anything soon or it could implicate themselves :)Is there ';inter-homogeneity'; of Collins test cases ?
What is the deal with all the Collins Project questions in the philosophy section?





But to answer your question, yes there are likely plenty of forgeries that are accepted as historical documents. It would be impossible to filter them all out. I'm sure whatever this 'Collins Project' is is no exception.
There should've been.
There was some finnagling of the numbers.
nah, iss all good





aight?