Do these decisions reflect more public policy than the application of rational rules?
Need help with this question
thankyouDecisions on causation are always problematic and clash with the blauve case test?
As far as I can recall Blaue is the case with the Jehovah's witness and her stabbing - the law on causation essentially revolves around the principles that were mentioned in Blaue ... there are many, many cases to back this up.
I have read many of the full text of causation cases ... none of them clash with Blaue.
I think that the law on causation is essentially a public policy decision - it's good to remember that there is general consensus that nothing but the worst medical treatment constitutes a Novus Actus Interveniens
I assume here that this is an essay/assignment question ... the answers should be in your notes from lecture/class
My advice: read the full text of your causation cases and see for yourself whether they clash with Blaue - it wont benefit you to get the answers from Yahoo - research them yourself ... that way you will learn better
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment