How do you expect to pass your classes if Yahoo posters do your homework?List three guidlines or tests the supreme court uses in its judgment of cases involving equal protection under
Do your own homeworkList three guidlines or tests the supreme court uses in its judgment of cases involving equal protection under
precedence would probably be one....courts are supposed to operate in a uniformed way. Controversial cases are based off of previous court decisions.
Friday, May 14, 2010
Is this smart right after I did a drug test for my job, I went and had one done on my own in case they ?
tried to sabotage the one they gave me to set me up further and make me look like a drug addict, so if they did do that it will back fire greatly and I will have great proof on many levels, what do you thinkIs this smart right after I did a drug test for my job, I went and had one done on my own in case they ?
Smart? Why wouldn't it be (or for that matter, why would it be?)
Paranoid? Yes. A problem? No.Is this smart right after I did a drug test for my job, I went and had one done on my own in case they ?
A waste. No matter what the result is, you are probably ';at will'; employment, which means you can quit or they can fire you at any time, for any reason. Why would they go through the trouble to set you up? They can just cite something like ';poor productivity'; and fire you.
Let's say the test they gave you was positive, and the test you took on your own was negative. Unless you got it done at the same clinic, they could easily say that the test you paid for was not as sensitive as the one they gave you.
';At will'; employment is the most common type of employment in America. Like I said, it means that you can quit at any time, and they can fire you at any time. The other main type of employment is anything with a contract (including union jobs). A contract may stipulate that you will work from X date until Y date, or if you are in a union, they will supposedly back you up if your employer were to try to fire you.
Because you are probably at will, your employer can let you go for any reason. Surely you haven't been 100% perfect at your job, and if they really wanted to fire you, they could find some reason without resorting to tampering with drug test results.
Which leads to my next point: There is no way they could have sabotaged your test, unless they just had you pee in a cup in the office and said they would take care of everything else. If they sent you to a clinic, then only clinic employees had access to your test. If it all gets tested by the same people, as you say, then why would one test fail?
And it really doesn't matter if the test you paid for is ';better.'; If the company has a policy to get all drug tests done at a certain clinic, then they aren't going to bother with the results you got from another clinic. And don't count on your clinic giving you any support in proving that their methods are superior - why would they?
The likelihood of someone at your work and someone involved in your drug test both being in the same frat, and conspiring to get you fired, is preposterously low. Again, they can fire you for any reason. If you are a good employee, they won't fire you.
I strongly suggest that you seek out psychiatric help. Everything you are saying is reminding me of someone I personally knew who had a severe mental illness.
A waste of time and money. Should the original test be tainted, there is a second sample, that you initialed, that you can pay to have tested. Your money will be refunded if it comes up clean. Tests are taken, sealed and sent out for testing after being supervised by you and initialed.
i think it was a waste. yours probably wouldn't hold up anyway because you could have had someone else take the test for you
Smart? Why wouldn't it be (or for that matter, why would it be?)
Paranoid? Yes. A problem? No.Is this smart right after I did a drug test for my job, I went and had one done on my own in case they ?
A waste. No matter what the result is, you are probably ';at will'; employment, which means you can quit or they can fire you at any time, for any reason. Why would they go through the trouble to set you up? They can just cite something like ';poor productivity'; and fire you.
Let's say the test they gave you was positive, and the test you took on your own was negative. Unless you got it done at the same clinic, they could easily say that the test you paid for was not as sensitive as the one they gave you.
';At will'; employment is the most common type of employment in America. Like I said, it means that you can quit at any time, and they can fire you at any time. The other main type of employment is anything with a contract (including union jobs). A contract may stipulate that you will work from X date until Y date, or if you are in a union, they will supposedly back you up if your employer were to try to fire you.
Because you are probably at will, your employer can let you go for any reason. Surely you haven't been 100% perfect at your job, and if they really wanted to fire you, they could find some reason without resorting to tampering with drug test results.
Which leads to my next point: There is no way they could have sabotaged your test, unless they just had you pee in a cup in the office and said they would take care of everything else. If they sent you to a clinic, then only clinic employees had access to your test. If it all gets tested by the same people, as you say, then why would one test fail?
And it really doesn't matter if the test you paid for is ';better.'; If the company has a policy to get all drug tests done at a certain clinic, then they aren't going to bother with the results you got from another clinic. And don't count on your clinic giving you any support in proving that their methods are superior - why would they?
The likelihood of someone at your work and someone involved in your drug test both being in the same frat, and conspiring to get you fired, is preposterously low. Again, they can fire you for any reason. If you are a good employee, they won't fire you.
I strongly suggest that you seek out psychiatric help. Everything you are saying is reminding me of someone I personally knew who had a severe mental illness.
A waste of time and money. Should the original test be tainted, there is a second sample, that you initialed, that you can pay to have tested. Your money will be refunded if it comes up clean. Tests are taken, sealed and sent out for testing after being supervised by you and initialed.
i think it was a waste. yours probably wouldn't hold up anyway because you could have had someone else take the test for you
What does pending case mean in University of the Philippine College Admission Test (UPCAT)?
please elaborate and explain.. what does this mean? can't fully understand. what actions may be taken in order to qualify? any real life stories there? anyone who had the same situation and can give me some advice????What does pending case mean in University of the Philippine College Admission Test (UPCAT)?
pending:
awaiting
until
in anticipation of
in the course of
for the duration of
imminent
until
throughout
about to happen
looming
forthcoming
in the pipeline
on the cards
pending:
awaiting
until
in anticipation of
in the course of
for the duration of
imminent
until
throughout
about to happen
looming
forthcoming
in the pipeline
on the cards
DUI the other day...No rights read, breathalizer, or blood test done...Have a case?...?
So early Saturday morning I was sitting in a parking lot, car was on. Cop pulled me out, barely failed the field test and yes I started to mouth off a little. There were open bottles in the car. Ummm, I received no breathalizer or blood test at the jail. No rights were read upon arrest...*Not sure if they have to anyways for a DUI or what that could mean* ....Should I fight this and if so and I still lose will the sentence be the same or will they be pissed I tried to fight it?DUI the other day...No rights read, breathalizer, or blood test done...Have a case?...?
Where do all you people get your info? MTV? YOU DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE YOUR RIGHTS READ TO YOU IN ALL CASES, PERIOD Miranda only comes into play when you are arrested AND they want to question you post-arrest. And NO, THEY WILL NOT ';THROW OUT'; THE CASE IF THE POLICE DIDN'T READ YOU YOUR RIGHTS, even when they should have. The point of this forum is to give information to people who are asking for help, not to give you TV-based opinion.
As for your case, what training have you had to judge whether you ';passed'; or ';barely'; failed FST's? None. FST's are not pass or fail, they are a means to see if impairment exists and at what level. The officer's training and experience is what determines the results of FST's.
You seem to get the gravity of what you did, which is a good thing. I hate to tell you you don't have much of a chance in court if the officer documented everything well. If this is your first and you choose to plead guilty, let the judge know that you realize it was a mistake.
Bottom line, being pulled over and arrest for DUI is a lot better then getting into a wreck and killing some 3 year old.DUI the other day...No rights read, breathalizer, or blood test done...Have a case?...?
They do have to read you your rights if you are arrested. There is no need for a breathalizer or blood test because you had open containers in your car. Fighting it will require an attorney and DUI attorneys are not real cheap. You can try fighting it on your own, but that is generally considered foolish. The ounishment will be the same whether you do decide to fight it or not.
Contact a DWI lawyer. Those slime balls can get you off the hook even if you were on video sometimes. They will not be pissed if you try to fight it, that's paid court overtime for the cop. Each state is different on their laws so I can't tell you if they needed to read rights, usually it's a statutory warning about right to refuse tests, etc not Miranda rights. Most likely you were on video at the station so just get the lawyer and don't drink and drive again.
They don't have to read rights anymore, the law was changed a few years back. You are probably hosed as far as a conviction, however, due to the weak nature of the evidence (no, blood or breath) you could probably get an attorney to lower the penalties and maybe even get the case dismissed if you are very lucky
you might have a case if you can prove you weren't read your rights. as far as the whole dui thing it depends on your state laws. i know in pa if you are even found in the drivers seat with the engine off and the car parked that can book you for a dui, my friend is a cop near pittsburgh and he told me that. so you'd best see an attorney and see what can be done.
Were you arrested for DUI? Then get a good lawyer and tell him you were not read your rights. If they can prove you failed the field sobriety test, you may be doomed. They could probably drop the open liquor charge if this was your first offense. I hope you learned a lesson!
My friend got a DUI years ago and the lawyers find out and start soliciting you. So pick one and see if you can get off. Next time don't mouth off to the cops you jacka@@. You probably deserve to be in jail but it is possible to get off. I hope it costs you a lot of money!
The only time miranda needs to be read to you is during custodial interrogation. in other words, no you have no case. The officer did everything legally
Simple:
Yes, you have a case as long as you had nothing to drink.
Also, how would you know if rights were read if you were mouthing off at the same time?
Take it to one of them cheesy outfits that fight traffic cases. Glad to hear the oinks didnt Taser you with Thomas A. Swift's Electric Rifle. Good Luck from the beautiful Dominion of Canada.
were you resisting arrest? Did you incriminate yourself by admitting anything................... get a police report of what happened and then ';get an attorney'; this can be dismissed caused certain things sound shady here... good luck
fight it, but get a lawyer, it will be cheaper in the long run. Oh and dont wear a beer logo t-shirt to court like my family members do! it wont help
Get a lawyer now! But besides all that ';open bottles?'; You must've been three sheets to the wind. At lease you weren't driving. But it sounds like a bad scene.
http://forum.freeadvice.com/
I'd check on that forum, they provide good help.
Call an attorney. THey can best advise you. We are not attorneys.
i believe they have to read you your rights, but look up like citizens rights on google or yahoo or ask.com
sounds like you werent treated fairly
Do as the first one said. Get a DUI lawyer. They will know what is what in your local jurisdiction.
www.duihelpnow.info
If you were not Mirandized there is no case.
Contact an attorney that specializes in DUIs.
depend ending on the state
yes u have a case because it is the law for an aresting officer to read u ur rights
Alot depends on your state law. In California, NO, you do not have to be read your rights when being arrested. This only applies if the officer is going to question you AFTER you are arrested. Everything else involved in a DUI investigation is simply that, an investigation and open to questioning without rights being read.
As far as fighting it, hope you have alot of money! To hire a DUI attorney will definately cost you.
I am a police officer...So I will let you know that they did not have to read you your rights...there are situations in which it is required but this is not one! They are only required to tell you your miranda rights during a interrogation.
as for the breathalizer or blood test....All the officer will need to prove is your impairment...all the tests do is add to the Probable Cause that you were under the influence....If the officer believes that he already had enough PC to make the arrest the tests are not needed.
Should you fight it? The chances are you are gonna loose either way. But if you hire a great lawyer, you can get the charge dropped to a lesser offense...But then you are talking a chunk of change...if this is your first offense...probation and Community Service...and go on about your way. If this is not your first offense...GET THAT PRICEY LAWYER, or YOU WILL LOSE YOUR LICENSE!
Get an attorney - it will cost you (and it should), but you may be able to beat it, or get the charge reduced. You are going to be paying out a lot of money anyway, so you might as well give it your best shot. And yes, the police have to read your your rights (no matter what) if they arrest you! Bad faux pas on their part, and yes it could cost ';them'; the DUI conviction, and get you off. ';They'; really don't need the breathalyzer if you fail the field test (I think) especially if it is on video, but that depends on the field test used.
Who cares if ';they'; will be pissed if you try to fight it? It's your future we're talking about, not theirs'. If you think you have problems now, wait until this DUI charge is finalized, and on your record. Every time a copy runs your plate, this DUI will pop up on the computer in his patrol car, and he will pull you over and check you out (you will be like a cheep watch, getting stopped every 5 minutes), all because you were foolish enough to be sitting in a parked car with the motor running (yes, that is DWI). And just wait until you find out what auto insurance is going to cost you now!
The bottom line, is that if you are drunk, and are sitting in a parked car, make sure that the keys are in your pocket (or the glove box), you are sitting in the passenger (or back seat), and the keys are not in the ignition with the motor running! CUT BACK ON YOUR DRINKING, OR IF YOU MUST DRINK, STAY AT HOME!
Where do all you people get your info? MTV? YOU DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE YOUR RIGHTS READ TO YOU IN ALL CASES, PERIOD Miranda only comes into play when you are arrested AND they want to question you post-arrest. And NO, THEY WILL NOT ';THROW OUT'; THE CASE IF THE POLICE DIDN'T READ YOU YOUR RIGHTS, even when they should have. The point of this forum is to give information to people who are asking for help, not to give you TV-based opinion.
As for your case, what training have you had to judge whether you ';passed'; or ';barely'; failed FST's? None. FST's are not pass or fail, they are a means to see if impairment exists and at what level. The officer's training and experience is what determines the results of FST's.
You seem to get the gravity of what you did, which is a good thing. I hate to tell you you don't have much of a chance in court if the officer documented everything well. If this is your first and you choose to plead guilty, let the judge know that you realize it was a mistake.
Bottom line, being pulled over and arrest for DUI is a lot better then getting into a wreck and killing some 3 year old.DUI the other day...No rights read, breathalizer, or blood test done...Have a case?...?
They do have to read you your rights if you are arrested. There is no need for a breathalizer or blood test because you had open containers in your car. Fighting it will require an attorney and DUI attorneys are not real cheap. You can try fighting it on your own, but that is generally considered foolish. The ounishment will be the same whether you do decide to fight it or not.
Contact a DWI lawyer. Those slime balls can get you off the hook even if you were on video sometimes. They will not be pissed if you try to fight it, that's paid court overtime for the cop. Each state is different on their laws so I can't tell you if they needed to read rights, usually it's a statutory warning about right to refuse tests, etc not Miranda rights. Most likely you were on video at the station so just get the lawyer and don't drink and drive again.
They don't have to read rights anymore, the law was changed a few years back. You are probably hosed as far as a conviction, however, due to the weak nature of the evidence (no, blood or breath) you could probably get an attorney to lower the penalties and maybe even get the case dismissed if you are very lucky
you might have a case if you can prove you weren't read your rights. as far as the whole dui thing it depends on your state laws. i know in pa if you are even found in the drivers seat with the engine off and the car parked that can book you for a dui, my friend is a cop near pittsburgh and he told me that. so you'd best see an attorney and see what can be done.
Were you arrested for DUI? Then get a good lawyer and tell him you were not read your rights. If they can prove you failed the field sobriety test, you may be doomed. They could probably drop the open liquor charge if this was your first offense. I hope you learned a lesson!
My friend got a DUI years ago and the lawyers find out and start soliciting you. So pick one and see if you can get off. Next time don't mouth off to the cops you jacka@@. You probably deserve to be in jail but it is possible to get off. I hope it costs you a lot of money!
The only time miranda needs to be read to you is during custodial interrogation. in other words, no you have no case. The officer did everything legally
Simple:
Yes, you have a case as long as you had nothing to drink.
Also, how would you know if rights were read if you were mouthing off at the same time?
Take it to one of them cheesy outfits that fight traffic cases. Glad to hear the oinks didnt Taser you with Thomas A. Swift's Electric Rifle. Good Luck from the beautiful Dominion of Canada.
were you resisting arrest? Did you incriminate yourself by admitting anything................... get a police report of what happened and then ';get an attorney'; this can be dismissed caused certain things sound shady here... good luck
fight it, but get a lawyer, it will be cheaper in the long run. Oh and dont wear a beer logo t-shirt to court like my family members do! it wont help
Get a lawyer now! But besides all that ';open bottles?'; You must've been three sheets to the wind. At lease you weren't driving. But it sounds like a bad scene.
http://forum.freeadvice.com/
I'd check on that forum, they provide good help.
Call an attorney. THey can best advise you. We are not attorneys.
i believe they have to read you your rights, but look up like citizens rights on google or yahoo or ask.com
sounds like you werent treated fairly
Do as the first one said. Get a DUI lawyer. They will know what is what in your local jurisdiction.
www.duihelpnow.info
If you were not Mirandized there is no case.
Contact an attorney that specializes in DUIs.
depend ending on the state
yes u have a case because it is the law for an aresting officer to read u ur rights
Alot depends on your state law. In California, NO, you do not have to be read your rights when being arrested. This only applies if the officer is going to question you AFTER you are arrested. Everything else involved in a DUI investigation is simply that, an investigation and open to questioning without rights being read.
As far as fighting it, hope you have alot of money! To hire a DUI attorney will definately cost you.
I am a police officer...So I will let you know that they did not have to read you your rights...there are situations in which it is required but this is not one! They are only required to tell you your miranda rights during a interrogation.
as for the breathalizer or blood test....All the officer will need to prove is your impairment...all the tests do is add to the Probable Cause that you were under the influence....If the officer believes that he already had enough PC to make the arrest the tests are not needed.
Should you fight it? The chances are you are gonna loose either way. But if you hire a great lawyer, you can get the charge dropped to a lesser offense...But then you are talking a chunk of change...if this is your first offense...probation and Community Service...and go on about your way. If this is not your first offense...GET THAT PRICEY LAWYER, or YOU WILL LOSE YOUR LICENSE!
Get an attorney - it will cost you (and it should), but you may be able to beat it, or get the charge reduced. You are going to be paying out a lot of money anyway, so you might as well give it your best shot. And yes, the police have to read your your rights (no matter what) if they arrest you! Bad faux pas on their part, and yes it could cost ';them'; the DUI conviction, and get you off. ';They'; really don't need the breathalyzer if you fail the field test (I think) especially if it is on video, but that depends on the field test used.
Who cares if ';they'; will be pissed if you try to fight it? It's your future we're talking about, not theirs'. If you think you have problems now, wait until this DUI charge is finalized, and on your record. Every time a copy runs your plate, this DUI will pop up on the computer in his patrol car, and he will pull you over and check you out (you will be like a cheep watch, getting stopped every 5 minutes), all because you were foolish enough to be sitting in a parked car with the motor running (yes, that is DWI). And just wait until you find out what auto insurance is going to cost you now!
The bottom line, is that if you are drunk, and are sitting in a parked car, make sure that the keys are in your pocket (or the glove box), you are sitting in the passenger (or back seat), and the keys are not in the ignition with the motor running! CUT BACK ON YOUR DRINKING, OR IF YOU MUST DRINK, STAY AT HOME!
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Help Need a lawyer for Toxic Black Mold case in ky ! have blood test and pic's !?
Have you tried the yellow pages?Help Need a lawyer for Toxic Black Mold case in ky ! have blood test and pic's !?
If you cant find a lawyer in your town with mold litigation experience then i would call every personal injury lawyer from the yellow pages and talk with them about it.Help Need a lawyer for Toxic Black Mold case in ky ! have blood test and pic's !?
Contact Dr. Shoemaker www.chronicneurotoxins.com he is a world specialist in mold illness and has protocols that you can give to your doctor that will treat the illness. Mold illness is treatable just finding the right doctor is key!
You can look up Toxic Mold lawyers on google.makeup art
If you cant find a lawyer in your town with mold litigation experience then i would call every personal injury lawyer from the yellow pages and talk with them about it.Help Need a lawyer for Toxic Black Mold case in ky ! have blood test and pic's !?
Contact Dr. Shoemaker www.chronicneurotoxins.com he is a world specialist in mold illness and has protocols that you can give to your doctor that will treat the illness. Mold illness is treatable just finding the right doctor is key!
You can look up Toxic Mold lawyers on google.
Has anyone had to undergo a hair follicle drug test for a custody case? How far did it go back?
I have tried to figure out online how far a hair follicle drug screening can go back to detect usage. I seem to be getting multiple answers for this on the internet, some places say 3 months, some say 6 months, so what is it? Please only answer with factual information that you have gathered from your own personal experience, I don't need answers that you got off the internet, I have already thoroughly investigated the internet. THANKS!Has anyone had to undergo a hair follicle drug test for a custody case? How far did it go back?
Hair tests actually go back years. The drugs can show in the follicle for about 3-6 months (so what you are reading is semi accurate) depending on the specific drugs being used. However, they can see the drugs you have done for as long as the hair is. If the hair is long enough that it was growing 3 years ago, it could show drug use from 3 years ago.
The problem with hair testing, is that its not completely accurate. They can only make an estimate of when the drug use was, due to differences in hair growth rates from person to person.Has anyone had to undergo a hair follicle drug test for a custody case? How far did it go back?
i didnt have 1 but i came very close to getting one about 6 years ago and the judge had told me that they would be able to see wut drus i have taken for the last 6 months
Drug screening is standard practice in pre-employment assessment, with hair follicle testing being the most common tool. Our company was told, by the medical vendor who conducts drug screening on our behalf, that the test covers 90 days.
Hope that info is helpful.
Hair tests actually go back years. The drugs can show in the follicle for about 3-6 months (so what you are reading is semi accurate) depending on the specific drugs being used. However, they can see the drugs you have done for as long as the hair is. If the hair is long enough that it was growing 3 years ago, it could show drug use from 3 years ago.
The problem with hair testing, is that its not completely accurate. They can only make an estimate of when the drug use was, due to differences in hair growth rates from person to person.Has anyone had to undergo a hair follicle drug test for a custody case? How far did it go back?
i didnt have 1 but i came very close to getting one about 6 years ago and the judge had told me that they would be able to see wut drus i have taken for the last 6 months
Drug screening is standard practice in pre-employment assessment, with hair follicle testing being the most common tool. Our company was told, by the medical vendor who conducts drug screening on our behalf, that the test covers 90 days.
Hope that info is helpful.
Can you request a polygraph test in a divorce case?
I'm almost 100 percent certain on that my marriage is over
One weekend she went down to Myrtle Beach (were we lived before I joined up in the Air Force and where we planned on relocating again) for some ';Interviews'; and of course this ex of hers lives like a town away from there.
She swears up and down she never saw him but hell she obviously has no trustworthiness in my eyes after catching her sneaking around on her phone remaining her ex Grandpa so I wouldn't even consider it anything until I read the text messages she was sending to ';Grandpa aka her Ex';
So anyways can I request a polygraph to be performed so if she had committed physical adultery she can go up the creek without a paddle?Can you request a polygraph test in a divorce case?
Yes you can request a polygraph test...but she has the option to either accept or decline. It is the same way in criminal hearings you cannot ';force'; her to take one. If you are filing for divorce...maybe you can ask her ex to testify that she has been unfaithful...play it off like he will get something out of the deal if you are serious about divorce. As for saying polygraphs are not reliable...that is false...they are around 95% accurate.Can you request a polygraph test in a divorce case?
I don't think you can get a poly dude. Maybe with enough money you could do it legally, but really why bother? I think if you are radar is that lit up then you already know the truth and it hurts like a mother. Keep an eye on her and start making plans for you're future is my advice. If she's really talking to Grandpa then why the sneakiness? Sorry.
No, you can't. You can file for divorce, but most states don't give a crap if adultery is involved. It is a breakdown of the marriage and that is that. You don't get extra points for being the hurt party.
You can request, but polygraphs are unreliable anyway.
Sorry, but you can't.
I don't know about a polygraph, but if you caught her in the act that is enough. Especially if you have a gut feeling because you are questioning ';if she committed physical adultery';, go with your feeling because you are probably right. If you really love her try marriage therapy. If she is unfaithful she is not going to want to take a polygraph anyway. Remember, marriage and marriage vows need to be honored and should be of great value in the eyes of both of you. Marriage is something you respect, honor, love and cherish. Something worth so much that you do anything make it work. She does not seem to show high esteem for her marriage. If you have grounds to divorce, there are still good women out there!
One weekend she went down to Myrtle Beach (were we lived before I joined up in the Air Force and where we planned on relocating again) for some ';Interviews'; and of course this ex of hers lives like a town away from there.
She swears up and down she never saw him but hell she obviously has no trustworthiness in my eyes after catching her sneaking around on her phone remaining her ex Grandpa so I wouldn't even consider it anything until I read the text messages she was sending to ';Grandpa aka her Ex';
So anyways can I request a polygraph to be performed so if she had committed physical adultery she can go up the creek without a paddle?Can you request a polygraph test in a divorce case?
Yes you can request a polygraph test...but she has the option to either accept or decline. It is the same way in criminal hearings you cannot ';force'; her to take one. If you are filing for divorce...maybe you can ask her ex to testify that she has been unfaithful...play it off like he will get something out of the deal if you are serious about divorce. As for saying polygraphs are not reliable...that is false...they are around 95% accurate.Can you request a polygraph test in a divorce case?
I don't think you can get a poly dude. Maybe with enough money you could do it legally, but really why bother? I think if you are radar is that lit up then you already know the truth and it hurts like a mother. Keep an eye on her and start making plans for you're future is my advice. If she's really talking to Grandpa then why the sneakiness? Sorry.
No, you can't. You can file for divorce, but most states don't give a crap if adultery is involved. It is a breakdown of the marriage and that is that. You don't get extra points for being the hurt party.
You can request, but polygraphs are unreliable anyway.
Sorry, but you can't.
I don't know about a polygraph, but if you caught her in the act that is enough. Especially if you have a gut feeling because you are questioning ';if she committed physical adultery';, go with your feeling because you are probably right. If you really love her try marriage therapy. If she is unfaithful she is not going to want to take a polygraph anyway. Remember, marriage and marriage vows need to be honored and should be of great value in the eyes of both of you. Marriage is something you respect, honor, love and cherish. Something worth so much that you do anything make it work. She does not seem to show high esteem for her marriage. If you have grounds to divorce, there are still good women out there!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)